Icon

Why Christians Cannot in Good Conscience Vote for McCain

The Irish surname prefix “Mc” translates to “son of.” In the same way that the name “Johnson” means “Son of John,” McDuffy means “Son of Duffy.”

And McCain means “Son of Cain.”

Now Cain, as you may remember, is the Bible’s first recorded murderer, having killed his brother Abel after offering a less-than-faithful sacrifice to the Lord.  God, of course, proclaims Cain to be under a curse.  Several verses later, we see that murder runs in Cain’s line, as his great-great-great grandson Lamech murders a man “for wounding me, a young man for injuring me.”

As Christians, this is something that we should be aware of.  Do we really want the man who runs our country to be of the line of a man cursed by God?

But, then again, Barack Obama is a Muslim.

God gave us brains.  He gave us reasoning abilities, and he wants for us to be faithful with those abilities.  It is a good thing and glorifying to Him when we take our time, use our minds, and discern for ourselves who we should vote for.  For some reason, the Church seems to have been tricked into believing that thought and reason are inherently satanic, that we should rely entirely on our guts when it comes to making big decisions.  And so we don’t look into anything, we trust what shows up in our inbox, and we form false opinions (opinions based on deception, based on flat-out lies; based on evil, you might say) because it sure beats the trickery of thought.

But our guts — and our hearts — are not always right.  They’re just as touched by the Fall as our minds.  And our politics.

Will reason and rationality save us?  Absolutely not.  We should always examine our line of thinking and our presuppositions, and attempt to align our thoughts and hearts to God’s.  But He has given us heads, and hearts, and hands, and He gave them to us to be used, and to be grown, and to glorify Him.  Not to be buried.

Am I saying that everyone should vote for Obama?  No.  What I am encouraging is that you seriously and genuinely look in to the ways that these campaigns are being run, that you look in to what the Bible truly means for this world and the way we treat it, and the way that we treat our neighbors, and the way that we run our businesses, and the way that we do all things, and make a decision based on that.  If you still believe that Obama or McCain is the choice for you, then great.  But don’t believe that there will be a “perfect” “Christian” candidate, because you are not perfect.  Expecting that from John McCain or Barack Obama is simply unfair.

We are not a lock-step minority.  We do not fall under party lines.  We are God’s agents of renewal in this world, the beloved who are chosen to help usher in the Kingdom of God.  Let’s take a long, hard look at what that Kingdom looks like before we go into the election booth.

*edit: I also need to say, in the name of being honest, that this entire process is something that I have ignored.  I’ve towed my own party line, and while it is not the one typically associated with American Christianity, I’ve not arrived there as a result of my own thoughts and prayers.  I’m as guilty as acting on my guts alone as anyone else; I just tend to do so from the opposite end of the political strip.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , ,

Oh Good Grief

This is what bad music writing looks like.

The writer clearly has nothing to say about Pattern is Movement, but rather than simply report the news (which is, of course, what he’s supposed to be doing), he feels the need to impose his personality upon it, resulting in the annoying mess above.

Pitchfork does this fairly regularly (see this post on Sufjan Stevens’ winning a prestigious award  for his symphony about the Brooklyn Expressway; you could write a book about Pitchfork’s relationship with Sufjan if you wanted), and it’s very annoying.

The problem here is that Dave Maher, the writer of the Pattern is Movement article, disrespects the band; in a space that could have been used to explain why we should care about Pattern is Movement in the first place (the closest thing we get to a description of their sound is the brief mention that they will be opening for Shudder to Think, “who are awesome”), Maher, who is not content to post a news item without adding a coat of his own personality, even if that coat makes the wearer look awful, takes the simple and sophomoric route of pointing out their beards over and over and over again.

Pitchfork news writers: write the news.  That’s your job.

Filed under: Uncategorized , ,

Okkervil River — The Stand-Ins

Usually I don’t do this, but I’m kinda proud of this review, and I think that this record (and Okkervil’s previous record, The Stage Names), present points worth talking about.  Which reminds me, please feel free to use the comments section to discuss this kind of stuff.  One of the great things about the internet now is that it’s opened the door for discussion of art and music; we don’t have to take other people’s opinions, and those of us who write those opinions can have our minds changed.  Anyway, here’s my review of The Stand-Ins from Aquarium Drunkard.

As some famous poet once said, distance has a way of making love understandable. Here we are in September of 2008, and Okkervil River’s The Stage Names, a record that was at first loved and then capsized by the digital wake of 2007, has floated to the surface unharmed. The Stage Names made few (if any) top ten lists last year, despite carrying the year’s greatest song, “John Allyn Smith Sails,” a requiem for poet John Berryman (oddly enough, that makes two years in a row that a song about Berryman is my favorite song of the year; see 2006’s “Stuck Between Stations” by the Hold Steady).

The Stage Names is an eloquent, purposeful masterpiece, the kind of record so alive with ideas and characters and wisdom that it seems to stand outside of time almost immediately. The odd, vaguely antiquated touches – early rock guitars, classic horn sections, a lyric sheet printed in paragraph form – certainly didn’t make Okkervil seem too concerned with the thoughts of the day, at least on a surface level. And perhaps that’s not without reason – The Stage Names is a close examination of everything that floats around the American culture of celebrity and financial “success”, and an attempt to redeem the people caught in its seismic boom; perhaps it’s necessary to stand outside of time in order to critique it.

The Stand-Ins, out Tuesday on Jagjaguwar, is a continuation of The Stage Names’ themes, both musically and lyrically. But where that record finds something worth celebrating in the midst of the mire – the bolts of grace that come with reading a good book in “Unless It’s Kicks,” for instance – The Stand-Ins is a mostly mournful affair. The songs here are more tender than their Stage Names counterparts, perhaps because the subjects are even further from the glittering circle of the scene. We meet the pre-fame boyfriends of actresses, we read the muddy hearts of porn stars, we experience the struggles of creative ennui. Will Sheff’s songs are about the people who flirt with the spotlight like a roach in the corners of the kitchen; when the light finally hits them, they shudder and sprint. And when all is clear, they make another go. Celebrity blesses its recipients like an atomic bomb.

Musically, The Stand-Ins is, as the name implies, something of an understudy, but that’s largely because the lead actor is such a star. Even the most cursory spin of this record is something akin to catching a Broadway matinee: not quite the main act, but it sure ain’t community theatre, either. “On Tour With Zykos,” the album’s best song, plays like a making-of featurette for The Stage Names; the narrator finds himself arguing with his girlfriend before heading out on tour, later returning home from a day at a meaningless desk job too tired to write; he gets stoned and watches TV instead of “revealing divine mysteries up close,” which he isn’t really feeling anyway, and yet at the end of the day he somehow finds himself the object of people’s fantasies. Guitars swell and bows pull across strings and somehow being in a band seems like the most tragic job in the world. The previous track, “Pop Lie,” which is itself a meditation on the problematic influence that singers have over their audience, is pulled back into the light, and we suddenly don’t know what to believe. And that’s exactly the point.

By now, you could make a case that Sheff is practically obsessed with the restoration of glory and dignity to the smudgy chests that have been worn out by society’s constant groping. In the hands of a lesser writer, this conceit could be patronizing, but Sheff’s literary – not to mention songwriting – talent is nearly unprecedented; I’m almost loath to pick at the fabric of these songs for fear that there’s no end to the yarn. But to leave Okkervil’s world untouched is to not realize that these songs are about all of us, too, that we’ve all been infected by the false vision of success. The glitz and the glamour comes tumbling all the way down the starry stairs, and it doesn’t stop just because we’ve turned off the television.

Like The Stage Names, The Stand-Ins closes with a eulogy, but where “John Allyn Smith Sails” was a paean to Berryman’s suicide, a sympathetic look at the death of a man whose body of work will far outlive its creator, “Bruce Wayne Campbell Interviewed on the Roof of the Chelsea Hotel, 1979” is a lament for the career death of the titular never-was glam icon. Campbell, who recorded two obscure records for Elektra under the nom de rock Jobriath, faded into obscurity after a failed publicity blitz, performing as a cabaret act under the name Cole Berlin and living in a glass pyramid on the roof of the Chelsea until his death from AIDS in 1982. Unlike Berryman, who was felled by an instant crack of his own creation, Campbell’s death – both in the music industry and the world – was a slow, drawn-out, and humiliating process that he certainly did not choose but couldn’t escape. Berryman leapt from the Washington Avenue Bridge in Minneapolis, but Sheff pictures Jobriath finally being lifted into his spaceship, flying ever skyways until he “forgets the crawling way real people are sometimes,” while cabaret horns and splashy cymbals play the requiem, fading eventually into a lilting acoustic guitar and keyboard shimmer. Berryman felt so broke up, but Campbell got to go home.

And this redemption seems to be the lesson that Sheff wants to teach so badly, if we’d only be willing to hear it; in album opener “Lost Coastlines,” which finds him duetting with former Okkervillian/current Shearwater head Jonathan Meiburg, the pair yelp “We’ve lost our way but no one will say it outright” before descending into a chorus of carefree “la la la”s. These maps that we’ve been following are only leading us into the outer darkness, farther and farther from home, and we know it; we’re somehow more attracted to the sickly fluorescence of false spotlight than we are to the sun. And yet, and yet – we may be dead in the darks below the surface, but our hands still somehow reach above the water, searching for some sunburst sense of warmth, some hand to take hold of the scene, some pro at his editing suite stitching up some bad movie.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , ,

Hey, Bo Diddley

Bo Diddley was the ultimate badass.  I’m not even taking applications anymore.  Anyone who can have a woman in a dress and beehive play throaty guitar like a proto-White Stripe is a-okay by me.  And check out the way this thing starts, with the synchronized dancing and the stoic march down the starry stairs.  And girls screaming like he’s a Beatle?  Wow wow wow.  Seriously, that guitar sound is so ferocious; I can’t believe he wasn’t more subversive than he was.  Rock ‘n’ roll.

Filed under: Uncategorized

More Radiobashing

This time, though, I don’t agree with it.  This from Oasis’ Noel Gallagher (typically Gallaghan strong language, be warned)

    They’re [Radiohead] middle-class boys worrying about pushing an envelope somewhere, and all that carbon footprint and all that bollocks. Every time there’s a polar bear on his tiptoes on an ice cube in the middle of the Antarctic, you know whose fault that is? Rock stars’. That’s their fault. Any time there’s food running out somewhere– ‘Let’s do a gig. That’ll sort it out. Let’s do a big fucking gig. Let’s fly everybody in from all over the world and pontificate to poor people about how they should be saving the planet.’ Go fucking kiss my ass. It’s very easy to just say, ‘We’re going to become difficult now and challenge our audience.’ I like my audience. They paid for my swimming pool. I’m not fucking challenging anybody. [via Stereogum, of course]

Whooo!  Let me start by saying that I’d love to respond to this just as sarcastically as Gallagher “responded” to Radiohead’s, I dunno, life decisions?, but in the name of keeping it clean, I’ll just quote Barack Obama:

It’s like these guys take pride in being ignorant.

The British Oasis recently flew in a jumbo jet to North America, where they motored across the continent in at least two gas-chugging buses (not to mention the buses of opening act Ryan Adams & the Cardinals), starting at the Pacific Ocean in Seattle and ending near the east coast in Toronto.  They played a whopping total of eight shows and traveled 13,328 miles (including the flights) to do so, and are far from the only rock band running the roads this summer.  The fact that he thinks that rock touring has no environmental impact is, well, ignorant. 

That’s not really the point of his quote, I know, and I do understand Gallagher’s problem with Radiohead, though it does seem a bit silly coming from him; the Gallaghers have always been biting at Thom Yorke’s frail ankles, both artistically and personally, and it’s not like the Gallaghers (particularly Liam) have ever kept their opinions to themselves.  But to act like Radiohead are being snobby by trying to offset the environmental effects of their touring is nothing more than a reverse snobbery, a we’re-more-rocka-roll-than-you fingerpoint.  

There’s this strange rock ‘n’ roll mythology that says that true rock ‘n’ rollers are rebellious, shirk responsibility, and generally frighten the decent folk.  I’m not sure what that comes from — I’m willing to point my hipbones at Elvis, I think — but it’s becoming something of an outdated notion, thanks in no small part to bands like Radiohead, who, following the path laid before them by the Beatles, the Beach Boys, the Band, Bob Dylan, Pink Floyd, Sonic Youth, the Velvet Underground, etc etc etc, believe that rock music can be artistic.  (And, yes, all of these bands did at one point shock and frighten the status quo, but they never refused to take themselves seriously.  In fact, with a few exceptions (Dinosaur Jr, maybe?), most enduring rock music bows to this conviction.  In other words, it’s willing to acknowledge its own power, even when it’s rocking the bodies to the back of the hall.  (See: Bruce Springsteen leading New York City after 9/11.)  And if you were to pin one of the Gallaghers down and strip away the thick, thick layers of cynicism and sarcasm, I’m sure they’d tell you the same; if this music didn’t mean anything to them, they wouldn’t have started doing it in the first place, and they sure wouldn’t have continued.  

This tendency to claim that rock ‘n’ roll doesn’t matter, and so the actions of its makers don’t matter, and so its implications are of no great import, is bunk.  And sad.  And while I’ll grant you that there’s little more annoying than a rock star whose concept of his self-importance greatly outweighs his actual importance (so tempted to name names here), there’s nothing sadder than being told that that song that you hold so close to your soul doesn’t matter, either.  

Mick Jagger, the veritable bard of tossed-off rock lyrics, claimed that it’s only rock ‘n’ roll, but that didn’t stop him from exploring this same idea in one of the most entertaining and thoughtful rock songs ever written.  ”Sympathy for the Devil” is, first and foremost, a sticky-hot rock song, right down to the juxtaposed “woo-woo”s and the snarling guitar solo.  But besides that, it’s a critique of humanity’s refusal to take responsibility for its actions.  ”I made damn sure that Pilate washed his hands and sealed His fate,” Jagger sings of Jesus Christ, and while Oasis sure as hell aren’t sharpening their nails, their who-gives-a-rotty-fuck attitude isn’t too far from it.  

And, no, I don’t like In Rainbows, but I’m still going to give Radiohead the benefit of the doubt more often than not; can’t say the same for the brothers Gallagher.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , ,